Many people have become interested in liquid biopsy in recent years. This may not come as a surprise, as the potential for clinical implications could be a consequence of the ability to detect and characterize malignancies in a modest and repeatable manner. It is unsurprising that extraordinary devices have been developed to facilitate this endeavor.
Nevertheless, clinical oncologists have not yet incorporated the technique into their standard toolkit. It appears that the research community is losing focus on a variety of assays that are based on various principles, as there are so many things to focus on.
Regrettably, the two biomarkers detected by liquid biopsy, Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA), are still susceptible to technical variability. This is predominantly the case for pre-analytical and analytical steps.
Fortunately, efforts are already underway to address these concerns, making sure that more clinicians around the world have access to liquid biopsy. However, this does not necessarily suggest that their primary goal is to identify and enhance a unique liquid biopsy methodology.
The primary focus is on identifying the precise combination of indicators that indicate the status of a specific health complication, such as lung cancer or any other type, as well as its origin and progression. In order to ensure that the situation does not end there, we must also keep a watchful eye on the immune cells of the circulating microenvironment.
Because researchers have known about their capabilities for some time now, more interventional clinical trials are needed to make liquid biopsies successful. Nevertheless, how can this be accomplished without compromising any of one’s values?
That is the point at which policymakers in the industry must intervene. Making it a non-invasive, quick, and dependable decision-making tool that we can rely on at any time, it will be simple and easy to implement sophisticated methods.
The future of liquid biopsy lung cancer appears to be promising as further advancements are made. The fact that clinicians in a variety of regions of the world are highly aware of liquid biopsy is even more intriguing.
In an effort to prevent oneself from being overtaken, it is imperative to acquire knowledge regarding the current situation. It is fortunate that this is no longer a matter of concern once one has a thorough comprehension of lung cancer and the appropriate treatments and diagnostic methods.